<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What Is Love?  (Baby, Don&#8217;t Hurt Me)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://melissamalka.com/blog/2010/03/what-is-love-baby-dont-hurt-me/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://melissamalka.com/blog/2010/03/what-is-love-baby-dont-hurt-me/</link>
	<description>Science, sarcasm, and other &#34;s&#34; words.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2011 18:15:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy</title>
		<link>http://melissamalka.com/blog/2010/03/what-is-love-baby-dont-hurt-me/comment-page-1/#comment-117</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 14:34:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://melissamalka.com/?p=253#comment-117</guid>
		<description>I think that people spend entirely too much time defining what love is.   This is something that both poets and scientists are guilty of.  I think it&#039;s just kind of there, and that&#039;s good enough.  It&#039;s like wondering why the sky is blue; yes there&#039;s a scientific reason for it, but does that change the fact that it&#039;s a pleasant and natural thing?

Personally I&#039;ve spent a lot of time trying to define love as well, and what I&#039;ve found is that it&#039;s an endless rabbit hole and it doesn&#039;t really get you anywhere.  That&#039;s not to say love itself is futile or fruitless effort - it certainly is not - but trying to quantify it is pointless.  I think it&#039;s just kind of there we&#039;re better off for that.

I don&#039;t know what love is either.  I&#039;ll probably never know.  Even when I think I&#039;ve found it, there&#039;s really no way to confirm or deny it.  But when I finally think I&#039;ve found it, it will make me happy and that&#039;s good enough for me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that people spend entirely too much time defining what love is.   This is something that both poets and scientists are guilty of.  I think it&#8217;s just kind of there, and that&#8217;s good enough.  It&#8217;s like wondering why the sky is blue; yes there&#8217;s a scientific reason for it, but does that change the fact that it&#8217;s a pleasant and natural thing?</p>
<p>Personally I&#8217;ve spent a lot of time trying to define love as well, and what I&#8217;ve found is that it&#8217;s an endless rabbit hole and it doesn&#8217;t really get you anywhere.  That&#8217;s not to say love itself is futile or fruitless effort &#8211; it certainly is not &#8211; but trying to quantify it is pointless.  I think it&#8217;s just kind of there we&#8217;re better off for that.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know what love is either.  I&#8217;ll probably never know.  Even when I think I&#8217;ve found it, there&#8217;s really no way to confirm or deny it.  But when I finally think I&#8217;ve found it, it will make me happy and that&#8217;s good enough for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

